Revisional Surgery Failure — Why It Isn’t Always Appropriate
- rachelkibble7
- Sep 7
- 2 min read
(Part 2 of 5 in our Revisional Operations Series: Which Surgery for Which Patient?)
When weight loss surgery doesn’t seem to be working anymore, many patients naturally ask about a revision. It feels like the logical next step: “If one operation helped, maybe another one will too.” But revisional surgery is not always the right answer — and in some cases, it can do more harm than good.
Weight Regain Happens — But It Doesn’t Always Mean Surgery Failed
It’s important to understand that weight regain is common after bariatric surgery. Life happens: stress, emotional eating, hormonal changes, or medical conditions can all play a role. Regain doesn’t necessarily mean your original operation failed.
If the cause of regain is behavioural or metabolic (like grazing, reduced activity, or insulin resistance), another surgery may not address the root problem. Without identifying why weight is coming back, re-operating can simply set the stage for disappointment.
Why Revising Without a Clear Cause Isn’t Fair
Revision is not a quick “reset.” These are complex operations with higher risks, longer recovery, and potentially more complications. If the only reason for considering revision is weight regain without a clear anatomical or medical cause, the likelihood of success is low.
It wouldn’t be fair to operate under those circumstances — because surgery must offer a genuine chance of long-term improvement, not just repeat the same cycle.
When Revision
Is
Appropriate
That doesn’t mean revisional surgery is never the answer. It can be highly effective when there’s a specific, correctable problem, such as:
Residual fundus after sleeve (meaning part of the stomach wasn’t removed, leaving excess capacity).
Severe reflux after sleeve that won’t respond to medication.
Anatomical issues such as pouch dilation, strictures, or malabsorption problems.
Persistent insulin resistance after sleeve where a metabolic procedure (like MGB) is more suitable.
In these cases, a carefully chosen revision can change the trajectory completely.
The Bottom Line
Revision isn’t a tool for every patient with weight regain. It’s about matching the right procedure to the right problem. Without that clear match, revision can set unrealistic expectations and expose patients to unnecessary risks.
For some people, the best path forward may be non-surgical strategies: dietary support, medical therapies, or metabolic treatments. For others, with a clear surgical indication, revision can be life-changing.

Comments